home

Indirect Tax

Sovos Docs

Audit preparation

Understand audit processes and maintain readiness for tax authority requests.

SAF-T has transformed how tax authorities conduct audits, but understanding when and how these audits occur helps you prepare effectively. While SAF-T submissions don't automatically trigger immediate audits, they significantly enhance authorities' ability to analyze your financial data and select cases for examination.

Understanding SAF-T audit timing

SAF-T audits typically don't occur immediately after submission. Like traditional tax audits, most SAF-T related examinations happen 12-18 months after the relevant reporting period, following standard audit selection processes rather than automatic triggers from submission.

Tax authorities now use SAF-T data to enhance their audit selection processes through automated analysis that can identify:
  • Unusual transaction patterns or anomalies

  • Inconsistencies between different tax filings

  • Mathematical discrepancies in reported amounts

  • Missing or incomplete data elements

  • Transactions that don't align with business patterns

This means that while audits don't happen immediately, the quality and consistency of your SAF-T submissions may influence your audit risk profile over time.

Two main audit scenarios

On-request SAF-T audits
Many countries use SAF-T primarily for on-request purposes during audits.
Countries using on-request model:
  • Norway: SAF-T files required only during tax audits

  • Austria: Electronic documents provided when requested by authorities

  • Hungary: SAF-T submission on-demand during examinations

  • Luxembourg: Files provided upon ministry request

  • France: FEC files required within 15 days of audit notice

Your systems must be continuously ready to generate compliant SAF-T files even if you don't submit them regularly. When an audit begins, you'll have very short deadlines to provide the required data.

Regular submission analysis
Countries requiring regular SAF-T submissions use this data for ongoing analysis.
Countries using regular submission:
  • Poland: Monthly JPK submissions analyzed for audit selection

  • Portugal: Monthly SAF-T data used for continuous monitoring

  • Romania: Monthly/quarterly D406 submissions enable ongoing analysis

  • Lithuania: Monthly i.SAF submissions support audit activities

Authorities continuously analyze your submitted data, comparing it with other taxpayers and identifying patterns that may trigger future audits.

Response requirements and deadlines

When you receive an audit request involving SAF-T, response deadlines are typically very tight.

Common deadline patterns:
  • France: 15 days after audit notice

  • Poland: Within 3 days for on-request modules

  • Romania: 30 days minimum for stock information requests

  • General pattern: Most countries require response within 3-15 days

What's typically requested:
  • Complete SAF-T files for specific reporting periods

  • Supporting documentation for flagged transactions

  • Explanations for data anomalies or inconsistencies

  • Access to source systems for verification

  • Historical data that may predate regular SAF-T submissions

Maintaining audit readiness

Continuous file generation capability
  • Ensure your systems can generate SAF-T files for any requested period

  • Test file generation regularly, not just during filing periods

  • Maintain the ability to produce files even after system upgrades

  • Keep historical data accessible according to retention requirements

Documentation standards
  • Maintain comprehensive audit trails for all financial transactions

  • Document data mapping decisions and transformation rules

  • Keep records of any manual adjustments or corrections

  • Preserve supporting documentation for all reported amounts

Consistency across systems
  • Regularly reconcile SAF-T data with other tax filings

  • Verify that financial statements align with SAF-T submissions

  • Ensure master data consistency across all reporting systems

  • Address discrepancies proactively rather than waiting for audit requests

Error prevention
  • Implement validation rules that catch common issues before submission

  • Review unusual transactions before they're included in SAF-T files

  • Maintain clear explanations for legitimate business anomalies

  • Document the business rationale for complex transactions

Responding to SAF-T audit requests

Immediate response steps
  1. Acknowledge receipt promptly.
    • Confirm you've received the audit request.

    • Clarify any unclear requirements with the authority.

    • Establish the primary contact person for the audit.

  2. Assess the request scope.
    • Identify which periods and modules are required.

    • Determine what supporting documentation is needed

    • Evaluate whether historical data requires special handling

  3. Mobilize your response team.
    • Engage IT teams for file generation if needed.

    • Involve tax specialists familiar with country requirements.

    • Assign project management to ensure deadline compliance.

Meeting tight deadlines
Prioritize by criticality:
  • Focus first on providing the requested SAF-T files

  • Gather supporting documentation for flagged items

  • Prepare explanations for known anomalies or unusual transactions

Leverage existing processes:
  • Use established file generation procedures

  • Apply existing validation rules to ensure file quality

  • Use documented reconciliation processes to verify accuracy

Communication strategy:
  • Keep authorities informed of your progress

  • Request clarification promptly if requirements are unclear

  • Notify authorities immediately if you encounter delays

Country-specific considerations

Different countries have varying approaches to SAF-T audits.
Penalty structures
  • Poland: Penalties up to 3,000,000 PLN for non-compliance

  • Czech Republic: Fines ranging from CZK 1,000 to CZK 50,000

  • France: Penalties up to €5,000 or 10% of adjusted tax amount

  • Portugal: Fines up to €5,000 for various compliance failures

Procedural differences
  • Some countries conduct audits primarily on-site

  • Others rely heavily on remote analysis of submitted files

  • Certain jurisdictions may request system access during audits

  • Appeal processes and dispute resolution vary significantly

For detailed information about audit procedures in your specific jurisdiction, refer to the appropriate country guide in this documentation.

Best practices for audit success

Proactive preparation
  • Conduct regular internal audits using SAF-T data

  • Address identified issues before they trigger external audits

  • Maintain current documentation of all accounting processes

  • Train staff on SAF-T requirements and audit response procedures

During the audit
  • Respond promptly and professionally to all requests

  • Provide complete and accurate information

  • Document all communications with tax authorities

  • Maintain copies of all submitted materials

Post-audit actions
  • Implement recommendations from audit findings

  • Update procedures to prevent recurring issues

  • Document lessons learned for future audits

  • Monitor for any follow-up requirements or communications

Effective SAF-T audit preparation transforms what could be a stressful experience into a manageable business process. By maintaining system readiness, ensuring data quality, and understanding response requirements, you can navigate SAF-T audits with confidence while demonstrating your commitment to tax compliance.